REMEDIATE · SOLUTION
Security Remediation Roadmap
Turn cited findings into a 30/60/90 security roadmap with owners, effort versus impact, verification criteria, and a baseline rescan.
Run a free domain scoreJoin Open BetaLast reviewed September 25, 2026.
SCOUTz keeps the source, timestamp, boundary, and next choice together. That makes the page useful to the seller, the owner, and the operator who receives the work after the meeting.
What belongs in the first 30 days?
Quick wins that reduce a clear exposure and have a named owner. The roadmap should say what changed, what dependency was required, and which check will be used on the baseline rescan.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
What belongs in days 31 through 60?
Work that needs coordination, policy decisions, or a customer-approved cloud change. The report should separate a recommendation from a completed change and keep exceptions visible.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
What belongs in days 61 through 90?
Repeatable operating work and verification that should survive the first project. A quarterly review is useful only when it can compare a pinned baseline with a later supported observation.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
Evidence, support, and boundary
Worked example
A monitor-only mail policy becomes a 30-day policy decision, a 60-day sender inventory and exception review, and a 90-day rescan against the pinned record. Each step has an owner and a stop condition.
This example is deliberately narrow. A finding can start a useful business conversation without proving a breach, a clean environment, a complete compliance program, or a commercial outcome. The report should say which of those statements it can support and which remain for the MSP and customer to establish.
How SCOUTz gets the MSP there
SCOUTz begins with the least intrusive source that can answer the question. The public domain layer dispatches 35 collectors and can reach 123 distinct finding types. When a customer approves the next step, the read-only cloud layer is a superset with 93 collectors and 370 reachable finding types. Platform-wide, 601 finding types across 91 emitting modules include fusion and correlation logic that runs on top of collector output.
Every finding carries authored business-language explanation, consequence, recommendation, and the evidence it came from. The ledger separates 440 scored findings, 107 context observations, and 22 declared non-reads. A check that could not be read appears as NOT ASSESSED THIS SCAN, so the next choice is visible instead of hidden inside a score.
The MSP still owns authorization, interpretation, customer communication, remediation, and the final commercial decision. SCOUTz supplies the record and the route. That boundary is what makes the output safe to use in a real relationship.
Frequently asked questions
What does SCOUTz actually read?
The public domain layer reads disclosed public records and signals. A customer-approved Microsoft 365 review reads supported configuration and metadata through a read-only connection. SCOUTz does not read messages, files, documents, chats, or prompts.
Does an unknown result count as clean?
No. A check that could not be read is declared as a non-read. It remains visible on the record and is not converted into a pass or a blended score.
Can an MSP use its own branding?
Yes. Client-safe output is designed for the MSP's name, logo, colors, contact details, and delivery motion while operator evidence remains available to the team doing the work.
What happens after the first result?
The MSP reviews the evidence, agrees the next action with the customer, performs the work through its own process, and uses a supported rescan or source refresh to show what changed.
Does SCOUTz perform remediation?
No. It explains findings, prepares a work plan, and defines supported verification. The MSP and customer authorize and perform the work.
Read the methodology, review the trust boundary, see the sample report, compare pricing, and run the public tools before you choose the next step.
SCOUTz OPEN BETA
Point SCOUTz at your next prospect. Walk in with a defensible answer.
Join Open Beta with a real MSP workflow. A person reviews every application before a workspace goes live. SCOUTz runs without an agent or install and never changes a configuration on its own.
SCOUTz prepares the conversation. The relationship and the sale stay yours.