MSP Security Assessment
Choose the right evidence-led MSP security assessment for a prospect, an authorized tenant, or a verification step.
Open the related path →ASSESS · SOLUTION
Cyber Insurance Readiness Assessment
Connect cyber-insurance questions to dated evidence, clear ownership, and an honest list of what remains unverified.
Run a free domain scoreJoin Open BetaLast reviewed September 25, 2026.
A cyber insurance readiness assessment should connect each application question to evidence that can support it, rather than treating a completed questionnaire as proof. SCOUTz helps an MSP prepare that evidence trail and keeps unverified answers visible.
SCOUTz keeps the source, timestamp, boundary, and next choice together. That makes the page useful to the seller, the owner, and the operator who receives the work after the meeting.
Why does a questionnaire need evidence?
Because a yes or no answer can hide scope, exceptions, date, and ownership. A source-labeled record gives the MSP something to validate with the customer and something to revisit when the application or renewal changes.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
What can SCOUTz support?
Supported public and read-only tenant observations that relate to application questions. The MSP must still interpret the carrier's exact wording and gather evidence outside the product where the source cannot answer the question.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
What should be marked unverified?
Anything that depends on policy execution, recovery testing, incident history, or a source the review did not read. Unverified is a useful work item, not an admission to hide.
The practical test is whether another person can understand the claim, identify its source, and decide what should happen next without treating an unknown as a pass.
Evidence, support, and boundary
Evidence stateWhat it supportsBoundary
Mail authentication and public headersA narrow email-control discussionNot proof of every sender or mailbox
Supported tenant MFA and application contextA documented configuration answerNot proof of exception handling or user behavior
Customer policy and test recordsOperational answersMust be retained and owned by the MSP or customer
Worked example
The application asks whether MFA is enforced. The MSP attaches the supported tenant state, lists exceptions and unread accounts, names the owner, and records the source date. It does not turn one policy object into a guarantee of every sign-in path.
This example is deliberately narrow. A finding can start a useful business conversation without proving a breach, a clean environment, a complete compliance program, or a commercial outcome. The report should say which of those statements it can support and which remain for the MSP and customer to establish.
How SCOUTz gets the MSP there
SCOUTz begins with the least intrusive source that can answer the question. The public domain layer dispatches 35 collectors and can reach 123 distinct finding types. When a customer approves the next step, the read-only cloud layer is a superset with 93 collectors and 370 reachable finding types. Platform-wide, 601 finding types across 91 emitting modules include fusion and correlation logic that runs on top of collector output.
Every finding carries authored business-language explanation, consequence, recommendation, and the evidence it came from. The ledger separates 440 scored findings, 107 context observations, and 22 declared non-reads. A check that could not be read appears as NOT ASSESSED THIS SCAN, so the next choice is visible instead of hidden inside a score.
The MSP still owns authorization, interpretation, customer communication, remediation, and the final commercial decision. SCOUTz supplies the record and the route. That boundary is what makes the output safe to use in a real relationship.
Frequently asked questions
What does SCOUTz actually read?
The public domain layer reads disclosed public records and signals. A customer-approved Microsoft 365 review reads supported configuration and metadata through a read-only connection. SCOUTz does not read messages, files, documents, chats, or prompts.
Does an unknown result count as clean?
No. A check that could not be read is declared as a non-read. It remains visible on the record and is not converted into a pass or a blended score.
Can an MSP use its own branding?
Yes. Client-safe output is designed for the MSP's name, logo, colors, contact details, and delivery motion while operator evidence remains available to the team doing the work.
What happens after the first result?
The MSP reviews the evidence, agrees the next action with the customer, performs the work through its own process, and uses a supported rescan or source refresh to show what changed.
Does SCOUTz determine whether a carrier will bind coverage?
No. It helps organize defensible evidence and unknowns. The carrier, broker, customer, and MSP decide how the application is completed and interpreted.
Keep the evidence attached to the work.
Read the methodology, review the trust boundary, see the sample report, compare pricing, and run the public tools before you choose the next step.
RELATED SOLUTIONS
White-Label Security Assessment for MSPs
Deliver an MSP-branded security assessment with client-safe explanation, operator evidence, and clear source boundaries.
Open the related path →SCOUTz OPEN BETA
Point SCOUTz at your next prospect. Walk in with a defensible answer.
Join Open Beta with a real MSP workflow. A person reviews every application before a workspace goes live. SCOUTz runs without an agent or install and never changes a configuration on its own.
SCOUTz prepares the conversation. The relationship and the sale stay yours.